首页> 外文OA文献 >The cost of long term therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a randomised trial comparing omeprazole and open antireflux surgery
【2h】

The cost of long term therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a randomised trial comparing omeprazole and open antireflux surgery

机译:胃食管反流疾病的长期治疗费用:比较奥美拉唑和开放式抗反流手术的随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIM—To comprehensively assess the relative merits of medical and surgical therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), health economic aspects have to be incorporated. We have studied the direct and indirect costs of medical and surgical therapy within the framework of a prospective randomised multicentre trial.
METHODS—After initial treatment of reflux oesophagitis with omeprazole to control symptoms and to heal oesophagitis, 154 patients were randomised to continue treatment with omeprazole (20 or 40 mg daily) and 144 patients to have an open antireflux operation (ARS). In case of GORD relapse, patients allocated to omeprazole were offered ARS and those initially operated on had either a reoperation or were treated with omeprazole. The costs were assessed over five years from randomisation.
RESULTS—Differences in cumulative direct medical costs per patient between the two therapeutic strategies diminished with time. However, five year direct medical costs per patient when given omeprazole were still significantly lower than for those having ARS in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden (differences were DKK 8703 (US$1475), NOK 32 992 (US$ 5155), and SEK 13 036 (US$ 1946), respectively). However, in Finland the reverse was true (the difference in favour of ARS amounted to FMK 7354 (US$ 1599)). When indirect costs (loss of production due to GORD related sick leave) were also included, the cost of surgical treatment increased substantially and exceeded the cost of medical treatment in all countries.
CONCLUSIONS—The total costs of medical therapy for chronic GORD were lower than those of open ARS when prospectively assessed over a five year period, although significant differences in cost estimates were revealed between countries.


Keywords: proton pump inhibitors; gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; antireflux surgery; omeprazole; oesophagitis; direct medical costs; indirect medical costs
机译:背景与目的—为了全面评估胃食管反流病(GORD)的医学和外科治疗的相对优势,必须纳入健康经济方面。我们已经在一项前瞻性随机多中心试验的框架内研究了医学和外科治疗的直接和间接费用。方法-最初用奥美拉唑治疗反流性食管炎以控制症状并治愈食道炎后,随机分派154例患者继续使用奥美拉唑(每天20或40毫克)治疗,有144例患者接受开放性抗返流手术(ARS)。如果发生GORD复发,则为分配给奥美拉唑的患者提供ARS,并且最初接受手术的患者已经再次手术或接受了奥美拉唑治疗。费用是在随机分配的五年内评估的。结果—两种治疗策略之间每位患者累计直接医疗费用的差异随时间减少。但是,给予奥美拉唑时每位患者的五年直接医疗费用仍显着低于丹麦,挪威和瑞典的ARS患者(差异为8703丹麦克朗(1475美元),3299挪威克朗(5155美元)和13瑞典克朗036(分别为1946美元)。但是,在芬兰,情况恰恰相反(赞成ARS的差额为7354芬兰马克(1599美元))。如果还包括间接费用(由于GORD相关病假导致的生产损失),则外科治疗的费用将大大增加,并超过了所有国家的医疗费用。结论:对慢性GORD的药物治疗总费用在五年内进行前瞻性评估时低于开放式ARS,尽管各国之间的费用估算存在显着差异。关键词:质子泵抑制剂胃食管反流病;抗回流手术;奥美拉唑食道炎直接医疗费用;间接医疗费用

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号